Your solution map/Engineering conditions

Engineering conditions

Confirm conditions. Prepare your next step.

For “BGA head-in-pillow open joints”, add details that may change the assessment order and check the basis and limits of each candidate.

Conditions can change the orderUnknown conditions are never assumed to be satisfiedAll choices stay in this browser

Engineering conditions

Use 4 key conditions to see how the assessment order changes.

Identify the unfused interface, then compare reflow thermal geometry, supply / placement, and wetting separately. Leave unknowns unconfirmed; “ready to evaluate” means method inputs are complete, not diagnosis or qualification.

Confirmed: 0 / 4 conditions0 paths ready for initial assessment

Joint evidence

Does first-reflow localization / sectioning show separately formed ball and paste without fusion?An open or ordinary 2D projection alone cannot confirm HiP. Cracks after fusion retain fatigue / IMC hypotheses separately.

Thermal and supply controls

Can temperature-dependent package / board topography and thermal profiles be mapped to defect locations?Room-temperature flatness or top-surface warpage does not prove ball / paste gaps during reflow. Matching support and temperature records are needed.

Can print volume / slump, placement alignment, and downforce records be compared with normal joints?Without printing / placement controls, gaps cannot be attributed entirely to package warpage.

Wetting control

Are ball / paste batches, storage, exposure, and wetting controls traceable?HiP shape does not establish oxidation. Do not select flux or atmosphere parameters without defined material controls.

All path assessments

Live assessment

Current assessment order

Paths ready for initial assessment appear first

Interface localization and sampling

Complete first electrical-test and interface-localization evidence.

Unconfirmed: Does first-reflow localization / sectioning show separately formed ball and paste without fusion?

Conditions unconfirmed

Reflow-contact and printing-geometry controls

Complete paired thermal-field, topography, and printing / placement data.

Unconfirmed: Does first-reflow localization / sectioning show separately formed ball and paste without fusion?; Can temperature-dependent package / board topography and thermal profiles be mapped to defect locations?; Can print volume / slump, placement alignment, and downforce records be compared with normal joints?

Conditions unconfirmed

Surface-wetting and solder-paste controls

Complete storage, wetting, and supply histories first.

Unconfirmed: Does first-reflow localization / sectioning show separately formed ball and paste without fusion?; Can print volume / slump, placement alignment, and downforce records be compared with normal joints?; Are ball / paste batches, storage, exposure, and wetting controls traceable?

Conditions unconfirmed

candidate solutions

Assessment with your current conditions

Assessment order does not indicate endorsement or performance

Temperature-dependent warpage / height-difference evaluationAkrometrixComplete paired thermal-field, topography, and printing / placement data.

Conditions unconfirmed

Solder-paste wetting and oxidation-control comparisonsIndium CorporationComplete storage, wetting, and supply histories first.

Conditions unconfirmed

First-reflow interface recheck requirementsBLNKK engineering review request (provider unconfirmed)Complete first electrical-test and interface-localization evidence.

Conditions unconfirmed

Indium8.9HF solder-paste wetting and oxidation controlIndium CorporationComplete storage, wetting, and supply histories first.

Conditions unconfirmed

FINEPLACER core plus BGA/SMD reworkFinetechComplete paired thermal-field, topography, and printing / placement data.

Conditions unconfirmed

5200TN solder wettability testingRHESCAComplete storage, wetting, and supply histories first.

Conditions unconfirmed

MUST3 pad solderability measurementGEN3 Systems LimitedComplete storage, wetting, and supply histories first.

Conditions unconfirmed

V810Ai hidden-joint 3D X-ray inspectionViTrox Corporation BerhadComplete first electrical-test and interface-localization evidence.

Conditions unconfirmed

Interface Analysis for dynamic mating-surface gapsAkrometrixComplete paired thermal-field, topography, and printing / placement data.

Conditions unconfirmed

The order changes only with conditions you confirm. Public information cannot establish suitability for your actual samples.

New test result? Update your assessment

After one round of comparisons, choose the next step based on actual observations.

What did first-round localization / controlled comparisons show?Select unconfirmed when interface evidence or comparable controls are unavailable.

Results only change the order of the next investigation; they do not modify condition answers, prove a root cause, or qualify a solution.

BLNKK editorial notes

Current assessment and next steps

Based on reported conditions and public sources. Ready to assess does not establish sample applicability or root cause. Order does not identify the best solution.

Known conditions · 0

Key unknowns · 4

Does first-reflow localization / sectioning show separately formed ball and paste without fusion?An open or ordinary 2D projection alone cannot confirm HiP. Cracks after fusion retain fatigue / IMC hypotheses separately.
Can temperature-dependent package / board topography and thermal profiles be mapped to defect locations?Room-temperature flatness or top-surface warpage does not prove ball / paste gaps during reflow. Matching support and temperature records are needed.
Can print volume / slump, placement alignment, and downforce records be compared with normal joints?Without printing / placement controls, gaps cannot be attributed entirely to package warpage.
Are ball / paste batches, storage, exposure, and wetting controls traceable?HiP shape does not establish oxidation. Do not select flux or atmosphere parameters without defined material controls.

Paths to assess

More conditions needed

Interface localization and sampling

Complete first electrical-test and interface-localization evidence.

Does first-reflow localization / sectioning show separately formed ball and paste without fusion?

Conditions that change this path

Does first-reflow localization / sectioning show separately formed ball and paste without fusion?Supports assessment: Unfused interface located · Unsuitable for now: Crack after joint formation

More conditions needed

Reflow-contact and printing-geometry controls

Complete paired thermal-field, topography, and printing / placement data.

Does first-reflow localization / sectioning show separately formed ball and paste without fusion?
Can temperature-dependent package / board topography and thermal profiles be mapped to defect locations?
Can print volume / slump, placement alignment, and downforce records be compared with normal joints?

Conditions that change this path

Does first-reflow localization / sectioning show separately formed ball and paste without fusion?Supports assessment: Unfused interface located · Unsuitable for now: Crack after joint formation
Can temperature-dependent package / board topography and thermal profiles be mapped to defect locations?Supports assessment: Comparable locations and thermal fields · Unsuitable for now: Only room-temperature topography
Can print volume / slump, placement alignment, and downforce records be compared with normal joints?Supports assessment: Printing and placement traceable · Unsuitable for now: Key supply / placement records missing

What to do next

No result provided. Clarify key conditions before arranging an assessment.

Does first-reflow localization / sectioning show separately formed ball and paste without fusion?

What to prepare

Defect locations and profiles; measurable package / board surfaces and support; printing / placement controls
First electrical-test failure map; unreworked abnormal and normal boards; disclosable sectioning / inspection capabilities

Questions to discuss

Are unreworked first-open locations and normal joints retained?
How are thermal fields, topography, printing, and placement aligned by location?

Public references

Indium Corporation · Minimizing the Head-in-Pillow Defect in SMT Assembly ↗Supplier technical explanation and cases, without batch-specific material curves or improvement guarantees.

Indium Corporation · Introduction to Head-in-Pillow and Non-Wet Open Defects In Electronics Assembly ↗Appearance categories do not establish causes or guarantee X-ray detection across structures.

Take your assessment with you

Download assessment brief

Download an editable Markdown file containing your problem brief, condition answers, assessment order, selected solutions, prerequisites and sources.

0 / 4 conditions confirmed0 selected solutions

The file is created in your browser. Its contents are not uploaded.

You can download a summary or ask for help without selecting two solutions.

OptionalCases and experiment versions0 cases · 0 versions in this browser

Track ongoing experiments

Save conditions, results and hypotheses as traceable versions.

Cases stay in this browser. Case titles, hypotheses, revision notes and structured assessments are saved. Your original search, problem brief and attachments are not automatically included or uploaded.

Open case workspace →Manage status, versions and usage records in the workspace.

Current case

Select or create a case firstA case connects experiment checkpoints into a version history.

Each version keeps its original conditions, result, hypothesis and selected solutions. Later changes do not overwrite it.

View candidates, full sources and limits

9 candidate solutions

Grouped by purpose. The order does not indicate endorsement, performance or sample suitability.

Selected: 0 / 3 solutionsAdd any solution below to compare. You can compare up to 3 at a time.

Select at least 2 solutions

Temperature-dependent warpage / height-difference evaluationPublicly documented methods / capabilitiesPublic information compiled by BLNKK · Participation and sample applicability to be confirmed

Temperature-dependent warpage / height-difference evaluation

Akrometrix

Compare thermal geometry using public optical methods; contact loss still needs joint evidence.

Basis: Akrometrix：Measurement Vision Technologies；Indium Corporation：Minimizing the Head-in-Pillow Defect in SMT Assembly

Akrometrix：Measurement Vision Technologies ↗Indium Corporation：Minimizing the Head-in-Pillow Defect in SMT Assembly ↗

Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships

Relationship to the solution catalogueCatalogue entry pending

The reviewed public information describes a workflow. It has not been linked to a specific product in the BLNKK solution catalogue.

Sample or process prerequisites

Defect locations and profiles
Measurable package / board surfaces and support
Printing / placement controls

Exclusions

Inferring reflow separation from room-temperature images alone
Treating top-surface curvature as a contact gap

Primary sources behind these assessmentsAkrometrix：Measurement Vision Technologies ↗Indium Corporation：Minimizing the Head-in-Pillow Defect in SMT Assembly ↗

View related Q&A

Solder-paste wetting and oxidation-control comparisonsPublicly documented methods / capabilitiesPublic information compiled by BLNKK · Participation and sample applicability to be confirmed

Solder-paste wetting and oxidation-control comparisons

Indium Corporation

Compare candidate pastes using public HiP mechanisms, with printing and placement fixed.

Basis: Indium Corporation：Minimizing the Head-in-Pillow Defect in SMT Assembly

Indium Corporation：Minimizing the Head-in-Pillow Defect in SMT Assembly ↗

Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships

Relationship to the solution catalogueCatalogue entry pending

The reviewed public information describes a workflow. It has not been linked to a specific product in the BLNKK solution catalogue.

Sample or process prerequisites

Ball / paste and exposure histories
Identical printing and placement
Abnormal / normal wetting controls

Exclusions

Directly applying supplier improvement cases
Inferring oxidation from shape

Primary sources behind these assessmentsIndium Corporation：Minimizing the Head-in-Pillow Defect in SMT Assembly ↗

View related Q&A

First-reflow interface recheck requirementsEditorial research / Service availability to be confirmedPublic information compiled by BLNKK · Participation and sample applicability to be confirmed

First-reflow interface recheck requirements

BLNKK engineering review request (provider unconfirmed)

Use HiP / non-wet-open appearance differences to plan targeted interface confirmation.

Basis: Indium Corporation：Introduction to Head-in-Pillow and Non-Wet Open Defects In Electronics Assembly

Indium Corporation：Introduction to Head-in-Pillow and Non-Wet Open Defects In Electronics Assembly ↗

Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships

Relationship to the solution catalogueCatalogue entry pending

The reviewed public information describes a workflow. It has not been linked to a specific product in the BLNKK solution catalogue.

Sample or process prerequisites

First electrical-test failure map
Unreworked abnormal and normal boards
Disclosable sectioning / inspection capabilities

Exclusions

Random sections without localization
Guaranteeing HiP from 2D projections

Primary sources behind these assessmentsIndium Corporation：Introduction to Head-in-Pillow and Non-Wet Open Defects In Electronics Assembly ↗

View related Q&A

Direct candidateCommercial product or serviceBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

Indium8.9HF solder-paste wetting and oxidation control

Indium Corporation

Evaluate reflow wetting and oxidation control as material options for head-in-pillow and graping defects.

Basis: The product page describes variants; the automotive card discusses oxidation control, voiding and surface-insulation-resistance tests.

Indium Corporation：Indium8.9HF solder-paste wetting and oxidation control ↗

Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships

Relationship to the solution catalogueSame catalogued solution

Indium CorporationIndium8.9HF solder-paste wetting and oxidation controlOpen solution details →

Sample or process prerequisites

For assembly processes requiring reflow evaluation. Alloy, powder and formulation selection matters; HF-family variants are not interchangeable.

Exclusions

Scope and limitations Oxidation control cannot guarantee removal of warpage-induced ball separation. Card-specific voiding and insulation results are not acceptance guarantees for every BGA. What to prepare BLNKK suggests paste grade/alloy, pad finish, printing/reflow profiles, warpage data and defect images for comparisons under matched conditions. Confirm with the supplier Confirm formulation/current data sheet, reflow atmosphere, storage/handling, residue and cleaning/coating compatibility, and sample validation.

Primary sources behind these assessmentsIndium Corporation：Indium8.9HF solder-paste wetting and oxidation control ↗

View related Q&A

Part of an evaluation workflowPublicly offered; confirm project configuration and availabilityBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

FINEPLACER core plus BGA/SMD rework

Finetech

Compare controlled BGA/SMD desoldering, residual-solder removal and reassembly when investigating joint failures.

Basis: The product page describes the rework cycle, calibration and observation/logging, with configuration-dependent features.

Finetech：FINEPLACER core plus BGA/SMD rework ↗

Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships

Relationship to the solution catalogueWorkflow component

FinetechFINEPLACER core plus BGA/SMD reworkOpen solution details →

Sample or process prerequisites

Finetech targets electronic assemblies and medium-size PCBs; package geometry, board thermal mass and neighboring components need review.

Exclusions

Scope and limitations Restored continuity does not prove the original cause or restored reliability. Rework changes joints and evidence; listed modules are not necessarily standard. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preserving original failure evidence and preparing solder/ball details, board thermal mass, moisture and heating history, and neighboring-component limits. Confirm with the supplier Confirm modules, achievable thermal profiles, removal/placement methods and post-rework electrical and reliability validation.

Primary sources behind these assessmentsFinetech：FINEPLACER core plus BGA/SMD rework ↗

View related Q&A

Supporting analysis or measurementPublicly offered; confirm configuration and scopeBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

5200TN solder wettability testing

RHESCA

Compare solder, finishes and aging when joint wetting is suspect.

Basis: The 5200TN page lists solder-wettability measurement, chucks and optional configurations.

RHESCA：5200TN solder wettability testing ↗

Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships

Relationship to the solution catalogueSupporting inspection method

RHESCA5200TN solder wettability testingOpen solution details →

Sample or process prerequisites

Compare representative electrodes, solder and flux under controlled conditions; confirm small-sample gripping and signal range.

Exclusions

Scope and limitations This is not imaging of head-in-pillow in a completed joint. Wetting curves alone cannot establish non-fusion causes. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing surface/storage histories, solder/flux and sample dimensions, with temperature, immersion and controls defined. Confirm with the supplier Confirm gripping, measurement range and method options, and how test conditions represent actual reflow.

Primary sources behind these assessmentsRHESCA：5200TN solder wettability testing ↗

View related Q&A

Supporting analysis or measurementPublicly offered; confirm project configuration and availabilityBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

MUST3 pad solderability measurement

GEN3 Systems Limited

Compare pad wetting in a head-in-pillow investigation.

Basis: Official pages/brochure describe wetting, bare-board pads and BGA restrictions, not a specific HiP diagnosis.

GEN3 Systems Limited：MUST3 pad solderability measurement ↗

Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships

Relationship to the solution catalogueSupporting inspection method

GEN3 Systems LimitedMUST3 pad solderability measurementOpen solution details →

Sample or process prerequisites

Use accessible pads or representative samples; match the bath/globule, fixture and flux to surface, thermal mass and contact geometry.

Exclusions

Scope and limitations GEN3 says balled-BGA curves test fusible balls, not the underlying pads. Offline wetting does not establish assembled-joint quality; vibration/airflow affect the load cell. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing pad metallization/storage history, solder/flux versions, geometry, reflow records, controls and anomaly locations. Confirm with the supplier Confirm pad sampling, fixtures, bath/globule, temperature and test method. Agree on curves, repeatability and acceptance criteria; check camera/software configuration.

Primary sources behind these assessmentsGEN3 Systems Limited：MUST3 pad solderability measurement ↗

View related Q&A

Direct candidatePublicly offered; confirm project configuration and availabilityBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

V810Ai hidden-joint 3D X-ray inspection

ViTrox Corporation Berhad

Locate suspected BGA head-in-pillow joints for same-location cross-section/electrical correlation.

Basis: Official information lists HiP/reconstruction applications and model-specific specifications, not validated detection on this stack.

ViTrox Corporation Berhad：V810Ai hidden-joint 3D X-ray inspection ↗

Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships

Relationship to the solution catalogueSame catalogued solution

ViTrox Corporation BerhadV810Ai hidden-joint 3D X-ray inspectionOpen solution details →

Sample or process prerequisites

ViTrox lists micro-BGA, flip-chip and multilayer joints; choose the model/configuration for board size, shading, pitch and imaging needs.

Exclusions

Scope and limitations One model’s best resolution is not family-wide. Suspect images establish neither electrical opens nor cause. Validate shading, artifacts, dose and detection limits on samples. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing board/package stacks, pitch/target layer, suspect coordinates, electrical results, controls, allowable dose for sensitive devices and existing cross-sections. Confirm with the supplier Confirm model/scanning/reconstruction, image quality, dose and options. Agree on same-location validation, false-call/escape assessment and delivered images/coordinate records.

Primary sources behind these assessmentsViTrox Corporation Berhad：V810Ai hidden-joint 3D X-ray inspection ↗

View related Q&A

Direct candidateCommercial analysis-software moduleBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

Interface Analysis for dynamic mating-surface gaps

Akrometrix

The explicit package-to-board gap analysis supports evaluating solder contact during reflow after coordinates, temperature and solder geometry are aligned.

Basis: The current page lists two-surface comparisons, gap gauges and user-defined assessment maps. An August 2014 U.S. Tech article also explains how interface gaps at process temperature can help locate potential interconnect problems.

Akrometrix：Interface Analysis for dynamic mating-surface gaps ↗

Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships

Relationship to the solution catalogueSame catalogued solution

AkrometrixInterface Analysis for dynamic mating-surface gapsOpen solution details →

Sample or process prerequisites

Akrometrix describes BGA/PCB and PoP interfaces, comparing surface shapes at process temperatures for assembly assessment and troubleshooting. The paired data need consistent temperature, coordinates and alignment definitions.
Paired PCB/package shape maps at matched temperatures
Registration, sign conventions and solder/paste height
Reflow timing and failure coordinates

Exclusions

Scope and limitations Results depend on matched temperatures, coordinate/sign conventions and alignment; user-defined limits need an engineering basis. Gap maps alone do not establish solder wetting, actual joint formation or lifetime. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing package and board topography at matching temperatures, alignment/coordinate definitions, solder ball/paste heights, reflow profiles and failure locations to compare geometric gaps with the contact window. Confirm with the supplier Confirm current Studio/Interface Analysis licensing, TherMoiré data compatibility, pairing and temperature-interpolation methods, and how acceptance limits are established. Discuss validation using cross-sections, electrical continuity or reflow trials.
Unmatched temperatures or unconstrained registration
Gap prediction does not prove metallurgical wetting

Primary sources behind these assessmentsAkrometrix：Interface Analysis for dynamic mating-surface gaps ↗

View related Q&A

Missing evidence and suitability conditions

Board-specific HiP detectability and general profiles are unavailable. “Open” or “pillow” alone cannot diagnose it.
Supplier participation, sample validation, and actual professional responses are not yet confirmed; public capabilities do not establish willingness to take on the work.
This local method has not yet been published as a canonical solution that demonstrates the same relationship.

References

11 manufacturer or institutional sources

Expand reviewed sources and limitations

Manufacturer technical informationMinimizing the Head-in-Pillow Defect in SMT AssemblyIndium Corporation · Reviewed 2026-10-04

Explains reflow warpage separating balls and paste, with printing, placement, tack, and oxidation controls.

Limit: Supplier technical explanation and cases, without batch-specific material curves or improvement guarantees.

Manufacturer technical informationIntroduction to Head-in-Pillow and Non-Wet Open Defects In Electronics AssemblyIndium Corporation · Reviewed 2026-10-04

Distinguishes HiP with solder retained on both ball and board from non-wet opens where board paste transfers to the component side.

Limit: Appearance categories do not establish causes or guarantee X-ray detection across structures.

Manufacturer product informationMeasurement Vision TechnologiesAkrometrix · Reviewed 2026-10-04

Shadow Moiré measures temperature-dependent warpage on smooth continuous surfaces; DFP measures discontinuous surfaces and height differences.

Limit: Top-surface warpage is not direct ball / paste gap measurement. Define surfaces, support, and thermal fields.

Manufacturer technical informationMicroStar BGA Packaging Reference GuideTexas Instruments · Reviewed 2026-10-04

Discusses fatigue of small board-level solder joints under temperature cycling.

Limit: Older MicroStar BGA guidance; its cycle counts or geometry are not thresholds for other BGAs.

Manufacturer technical informationIndium-Copper Intermetallics in SolderingIndium Corporation · Reviewed 2026-10-04

Discusses harder intermetallic layers and possible fractures from In / Cu diffusion.

Limit: Covers In / Cu only. For Sn-based BGA, fracture localization can retain the neighboring issue; material or thickness recommendations cannot transfer.

Manufacturer product informationIndium8.9HF solder-paste wetting and oxidation controlIndium Corporation · Reviewed 2026-10-05

The product page describes variants; the automotive card discusses oxidation control, voiding and surface-insulation-resistance tests.

Limit: Scope and limitations Oxidation control cannot guarantee removal of warpage-induced ball separation. Card-specific voiding and insulation results are not acceptance guarantees for every BGA. What to prepare BLNKK suggests paste grade/alloy, pad finish, printing/reflow profiles, warpage data and defect images for comparisons under matched conditions. Confirm with the supplier Confirm formulation/current data sheet, reflow atmosphere, storage/handling, residue and cleaning/coating compatibility, and sample validation.

Manufacturer product informationFINEPLACER core plus BGA/SMD reworkFinetech · Reviewed 2026-10-06

The product page describes the rework cycle, calibration and observation/logging, with configuration-dependent features.

Limit: Scope and limitations Restored continuity does not prove the original cause or restored reliability. Rework changes joints and evidence; listed modules are not necessarily standard. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preserving original failure evidence and preparing solder/ball details, board thermal mass, moisture and heating history, and neighboring-component limits. Confirm with the supplier Confirm modules, achievable thermal profiles, removal/placement methods and post-rework electrical and reliability validation.

Manufacturer product information5200TN solder wettability testingRHESCA · Reviewed 2026-10-06

The 5200TN page lists solder-wettability measurement, chucks and optional configurations.

Limit: Scope and limitations This is not imaging of head-in-pillow in a completed joint. Wetting curves alone cannot establish non-fusion causes. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing surface/storage histories, solder/flux and sample dimensions, with temperature, immersion and controls defined. Confirm with the supplier Confirm gripping, measurement range and method options, and how test conditions represent actual reflow.

Manufacturer product informationMUST3 pad solderability measurementGEN3 Systems Limited · Reviewed 2026-10-06

Official pages/brochure describe wetting, bare-board pads and BGA restrictions, not a specific HiP diagnosis.

Limit: Scope and limitations GEN3 says balled-BGA curves test fusible balls, not the underlying pads. Offline wetting does not establish assembled-joint quality; vibration/airflow affect the load cell. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing pad metallization/storage history, solder/flux versions, geometry, reflow records, controls and anomaly locations. Confirm with the supplier Confirm pad sampling, fixtures, bath/globule, temperature and test method. Agree on curves, repeatability and acceptance criteria; check camera/software configuration.

Manufacturer product informationV810Ai hidden-joint 3D X-ray inspectionViTrox Corporation Berhad · Reviewed 2026-10-06

Official information lists HiP/reconstruction applications and model-specific specifications, not validated detection on this stack.

Limit: Scope and limitations One model’s best resolution is not family-wide. Suspect images establish neither electrical opens nor cause. Validate shading, artifacts, dose and detection limits on samples. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing board/package stacks, pitch/target layer, suspect coordinates, electrical results, controls, allowable dose for sensitive devices and existing cross-sections. Confirm with the supplier Confirm model/scanning/reconstruction, image quality, dose and options. Agree on same-location validation, false-call/escape assessment and delivered images/coordinate records.

Manufacturer product informationInterface Analysis for dynamic mating-surface gapsAkrometrix · Reviewed 2026-10-06

The current page lists two-surface comparisons, gap gauges and user-defined assessment maps. An August 2014 U.S. Tech article also explains how interface gaps at process temperature can help locate potential interconnect problems.

Limit: Scope and limitations Results depend on matched temperatures, coordinate/sign conventions and alignment; user-defined limits need an engineering basis. Gap maps alone do not establish solder wetting, actual joint formation or lifetime. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing package and board topography at matching temperatures, alignment/coordinate definitions, solder ball/paste heights, reflow profiles and failure locations to compare geometric gaps with the contact window. Confirm with the supplier Confirm current Studio/Interface Analysis licensing, TherMoiré data compatibility, pairing and temperature-interpolation methods, and how acceptance limits are established. Discuss validation using cross-sections, electrical continuity or reflow trials.

Before assessment

Questions to ask before assessment

Expand assessment checklist

Are unreworked first-open locations and normal joints retained?
How are thermal fields, topography, printing, and placement aligned by location?
Are ball / paste exposure and wetting controls traceable?

View related technical Q&A →

BLNKK editorial notes

Related technical Q&A

Are unreworked first-open locations and normal joints retained?
How are thermal fields, topography, printing, and placement aligned by location?

View related technical Q&A →