BLNKKSOLUTION NAVIGATOR
Menu
Current problemInternal voids in substrate microvia copper fill
Your solution map/Engineering conditions

Engineering conditions

Confirm conditions. Prepare your next step.

For “Internal voids in substrate microvia copper fill”, add details that may change the assessment order and check the basis and limits of each candidate.

Conditions can change the orderUnknown conditions are never assumed to be satisfiedAll choices stay in this browser

Engineering conditions

Use 4 key conditions to see how the assessment order changes.

First localize voids / seams in the microvia copper body before assembly, then compare pretreatment and electroplating histories by via geometry and location distribution. Unknowns remain unconfirmed. “Ready for assessment” means only that the method inputs are complete; it does not establish diagnosis or qualification.

Confirmed: 0 / 4 conditions0 paths ready for initial assessment

Intravia morphology

Process histories

All path assessments

Live assessment

Current assessment order

Paths ready for initial assessment appear first
01
Intravia morphology and representative sampling

First obtain pre-assembly intravia locations and batch maps.

Unconfirmed: Have pre-assembly voids / seams been localized to the copper-fill body in organic-substrate microvias?; Can via geometry, panel location, batch, and normal / abnormal sampling be correlated?
Conditions unconfirmed
02
Via formation / pretreatment / metallization comparisons

First obtain via geometry, metallization evidence, and waiting / treatment traces.

Unconfirmed: Have pre-assembly voids / seams been localized to the copper-fill body in organic-substrate microvias?; Can via geometry, panel location, batch, and normal / abnormal sampling be correlated?; Are drilling, desmear, wetting / electroless copper, and waiting histories before copper filling traceable?
Conditions unconfirmed
03
Copper-fill electroplating and location-distribution comparisons

First obtain shared via geometry and electroplating / solution-flow traces.

Unconfirmed: Have pre-assembly voids / seams been localized to the copper-fill body in organic-substrate microvias?; Can via geometry, panel location, batch, and normal / abnormal sampling be correlated?; Are current, additives / CVS, solution flow, and bath / equipment conditions comparable for the same via geometry?
Conditions unconfirmed

candidate solutions

Assessment with your current conditions

Assessment order does not indicate endorsement or performance
Evaluation of targeted analysis and sampling of the copper-fill bodyASEFirst obtain pre-assembly intravia locations and batch maps.
Conditions unconfirmed
Evaluation of InPro SAP3 as a microvia copper-fill candidateMKS / AtotechFirst obtain shared via geometry and electroplating / solution-flow traces.
Conditions unconfirmed
Joint review of pretreatment and copper-fill windowsBLNKK engineering review request (provider unconfirmed)First obtain via geometry, metallization evidence, and waiting / treatment traces.
Conditions unconfirmed
InPro MVF blind-microvia copper fillingMKS’ AtotechFirst obtain shared via geometry and electroplating / solution-flow traces.
Conditions unconfirmed
nano3DX 3D X-ray sampling of substrate copper-fill voidsRigakuFirst obtain pre-assembly intravia locations and batch maps.
Conditions unconfirmed
MacDermid Alpha Systek VTP 100 via-fill/RDL platingMacDermid Alpha Electronics SolutionsFirst obtain shared via geometry and electroplating / solution-flow traces.
Conditions unconfirmed
NEXAR LIDE glass via and microstructure fabricationLPKF Laser & Electronics SEFirst obtain via geometry, metallization evidence, and waiting / treatment traces.
Conditions unconfirmed
SMV-500F interposer Ti/Cu seed sputteringULVAC, Inc.First obtain via geometry, metallization evidence, and waiting / treatment traces.
Conditions unconfirmed
MultiPrep targeted cross-section polishingAllied High Tech Products, Inc.First obtain pre-assembly intravia locations and batch maps.
Conditions unconfirmed

The order changes only with conditions you confirm. Public information cannot establish suitability for your actual samples.

New test result? Update your assessment

After one round of comparisons, choose the next step based on actual observations.

Results only change the order of the next investigation; they do not modify condition answers, prove a root cause, or qualify a solution.

BLNKK editorial notes

Current assessment and next steps

Based on reported conditions and public sources. Ready to assess does not establish sample applicability or root cause. Order does not identify the best solution.

Known conditions · 0

    Key unknowns · 4

    • Have pre-assembly voids / seams been localized to the copper-fill body in organic-substrate microvias?Separate incomplete intravia fill, dimples, and Cu / Cu interface cracks. Do not label every dark X-ray region a void.
    • Can via geometry, panel location, batch, and normal / abnormal sampling be correlated?Preserve via diameter / depth and sampling direction. A single cross-section cannot establish the void fraction across an entire batch.
    • Are drilling, desmear, wetting / electroless copper, and waiting histories before copper filling traceable?Observe via-wall and bottom metallization quality. A public process sequence does not establish that a particular pretreatment caused this via's voids.
    • Are current, additives / CVS, solution flow, and bath / equipment conditions comparable for the same via geometry?Record actual equipment and chemistry. Do not directly apply public SAP3 values or infer additives from void shapes.

    Paths to assess

    More conditions needed

    Intravia morphology and representative sampling

    First obtain pre-assembly intravia locations and batch maps.

    • Have pre-assembly voids / seams been localized to the copper-fill body in organic-substrate microvias?
    • Can via geometry, panel location, batch, and normal / abnormal sampling be correlated?
    Conditions that change this path
    • Have pre-assembly voids / seams been localized to the copper-fill body in organic-substrate microvias?Supports assessment: Pre-assembly copper-fill body anomaly localized · Unsuitable for now: Only later interface cracks or vias outside the substrate
    • Can via geometry, panel location, batch, and normal / abnormal sampling be correlated?Supports assessment: Via geometry / batch / location sampling is comparable · Unsuitable for now: Only isolated cross-sections
    More conditions needed

    Via formation / pretreatment / metallization comparisons

    First obtain via geometry, metallization evidence, and waiting / treatment traces.

    • Have pre-assembly voids / seams been localized to the copper-fill body in organic-substrate microvias?
    • Can via geometry, panel location, batch, and normal / abnormal sampling be correlated?
    • Are drilling, desmear, wetting / electroless copper, and waiting histories before copper filling traceable?
    Conditions that change this path
    • Have pre-assembly voids / seams been localized to the copper-fill body in organic-substrate microvias?Supports assessment: Pre-assembly copper-fill body anomaly localized · Unsuitable for now: Only later interface cracks or vias outside the substrate
    • Can via geometry, panel location, batch, and normal / abnormal sampling be correlated?Supports assessment: Via geometry / batch / location sampling is comparable · Unsuitable for now: Only isolated cross-sections
    • Are drilling, desmear, wetting / electroless copper, and waiting histories before copper filling traceable?Supports assessment: Via-formation / pretreatment histories are comparable · Unsuitable for now: Insufficient pretreatment / metallization histories

    What to do next

    No result provided. Clarify key conditions before arranging an assessment.

    1. Have pre-assembly voids / seams been localized to the copper-fill body in organic-substrate microvias?

    What to prepare

    • Pre-assembly via-geometry / location maps; Normal / abnormal samples; Targeted cross-sections and non-destructive data
    • Via-formation / metallization samples and histories; Electroplating / solution-flow traces for the same via geometry; Representative normal / abnormal locations

    Questions to discuss

    • Is the void in the copper-fill body or at a Cu / Cu interface after thermal loading?
    • Are via geometry, panel locations, and normal / abnormal sampling representative?

    Public references

    ASE · Failure Analysis Lab ↗The service list does not guarantee detection rates at every RDL or microvia scale; sampling, structures, and destructive risks require confirmation.

    MKS / Atotech · InPro SAP3 ↗Product capabilities apply to the specified system. They do not establish the cause of this batch's voids; do not directly adopt current density, via dimensions, or dimple values.

    Take your assessment with you

    Download assessment brief

    Download an editable Markdown file containing your problem brief, condition answers, assessment order, selected solutions, prerequisites and sources.

    0 / 4 conditions confirmed0 selected solutions
    The file is created in your browser. Its contents are not uploaded.

    You can download a summary or ask for help without selecting two solutions.

    OptionalCases and experiment versions0 cases · 0 versions in this browser

    Track ongoing experiments

    Save conditions, results and hypotheses as traceable versions.

    Cases stay in this browser. Case titles, hypotheses, revision notes and structured assessments are saved. Your original search, problem brief and attachments are not automatically included or uploaded.

    Open case workspace →Manage status, versions and usage records in the workspace.
    Select or create a case firstA case connects experiment checkpoints into a version history.

    Each version keeps its original conditions, result, hypothesis and selected solutions. Later changes do not overwrite it.

    View candidates, full sources and limits

    Related solutions

    9 candidate solutions

    Grouped by purpose. The order does not indicate endorsement, performance or sample suitability.
    Selected: 0 / 3 solutionsAdd any solution below to compare. You can compare up to 3 at a time.
    Select at least 2 solutions
    01
    Evaluation of targeted analysis and sampling of the copper-fill bodyPublicly documented methods / capabilitiesPublic information compiled by BLNKK · Participation and sample applicability to be confirmed

    Evaluation of targeted analysis and sampling of the copper-fill body

    ASE

    Public non-destructive and cross-section capabilities may support evaluation of microvia morphology at known locations.

    Basis: ASE:Failure Analysis Lab
    Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships
    Relationship to the solution catalogueCatalogue entry pending

    The reviewed public information describes a workflow. It has not been linked to a specific product in the BLNKK solution catalogue.

    Sample or process prerequisites
    • Pre-assembly via-geometry / location maps
    • Normal / abnormal samples
    • Targeted cross-sections and non-destructive data
    Exclusions
    • Labeling dark X-ray regions directly as voids
    • Calculating a whole-batch void rate from one section
    Primary sources behind these assessmentsASE:Failure Analysis Lab ↗
    View related Q&A
    02
    Evaluation of InPro SAP3 as a microvia copper-fill candidatePublicly documented methods / capabilitiesPublic information compiled by BLNKK · Participation and sample applicability to be confirmed

    Evaluation of InPro SAP3 as a microvia copper-fill candidate

    MKS / Atotech

    Public IC-substrate BMV capabilities can be included in chemistry / equipment comparisons.

    Basis: MKS / Atotech:InPro SAP3
    Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships
    Relationship to the solution catalogueCatalogue entry pending

    The reviewed public information describes a workflow. It has not been linked to a specific product in the BLNKK solution catalogue.

    Sample or process prerequisites
    • Shared via geometry and void distributions
    • Actual VCP / bath and CVS traces
    • Current / solution flow and normal samples
    Exclusions
    • Using supplier claims to guarantee void-free fill
    • Selecting additives directly from defect shapes
    Primary sources behind these assessmentsMKS / Atotech:InPro SAP3 ↗
    View related Q&A
    03
    Joint review of pretreatment and copper-fill windowsEditorial research / Service availability to be confirmedPublic information compiled by BLNKK · Participation and sample applicability to be confirmed

    Joint review of pretreatment and copper-fill windows

    BLNKK engineering review request (provider unconfirmed)

    Compare metallization inputs and electroplating responses only when data from both stages are complete.

    Basis: MKS / Atotech:Optimize the interconnect;MKS / Atotech:InPro SAP3
    Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships
    Relationship to the solution catalogueCatalogue entry pending

    The reviewed public information describes a workflow. It has not been linked to a specific product in the BLNKK solution catalogue.

    Sample or process prerequisites
    • Via-formation / metallization samples and histories
    • Electroplating / solution-flow traces for the same via geometry
    • Representative normal / abnormal locations
    Exclusions
    • Changing only the bath and ignoring via formation
    • Claiming subsequent reliability qualification merely because vias are filled
    View related Q&A
    04
    Direct candidateCommercial product or serviceBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

    InPro MVF blind-microvia copper filling

    MKS’ Atotech

    Evaluate via filling versus surface copper deposition on organic boards.

    Basis: The MVF/MVF2 page describes process configuration and filling examples; a separate portfolio explains the broader InPro family.
    Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships
    Relationship to the solution catalogueSame catalogued solution
    MKS’ AtotechInPro MVF blind-microvia copper fillingOpen solution details →
    Sample or process prerequisites
    • Listed uses include HDI/flex PCBs, with or without conformal through-hole plating. IC substrates and particular via geometries require confirmation.
    Exclusions
    • Scope and limitations Family-level pulse plating and IC-substrate applications do not establish MVF suitability. Examples and reliability statements do not guarantee void-free filling or qualification for every geometry. What to prepare BLNKK suggests via dimensions, materials/seed layers, existing plating conditions, cross-section defects and surface-copper targets. Confirm with the supplier Confirm MVF/MVF2 selection, geometry-specific process windows, agitation/replenishment, acceptance criteria and reliability-test conditions.
    Primary sources behind these assessmentsMKS’ Atotech:InPro MVF blind-microvia copper filling ↗
    View related Q&A
    05
    Supporting analysis or measurementPublicly offered; confirm configuration and availabilityBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

    nano3DX 3D X-ray sampling of substrate copper-fill voids

    Rigaku

    Copper-fill voids can occur at different substrate depths; 3D imaging complements individual cross-sections.

    Basis: Rigaku describes the imaging method; its 2019 journal article demonstrates internal electronic-component and PCB imaging.
    Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships
    Relationship to the solution catalogueSupporting inspection method
    Rigakunano3DX 3D X-ray sampling of substrate copper-fill voidsOpen solution details →
    Sample or process prerequisites
    • Substrates or coupons need adequate penetration/contrast and suitable dimensions and rotation clearance.
    Exclusions
    • Scope and limitations Metal thickness and settings affect penetration/contrast. Voxel size is not defect-detection size; images do not establish electrical continuity or chemical identity. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing stack-up, copper thickness, specimen dimensions, suspected void locations/sizes and representative samples for section correlation. Confirm with the supplier Confirm targets, field of view, acquisition/reconstruction, defect recognition and repeatability; discuss correlation with cross-sections.
    View related Q&A
    06
    Direct candidatePublicly offered; confirm configuration and availabilityBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

    MacDermid Alpha Systek VTP 100 via-fill/RDL plating

    MacDermid Alpha Electronics Solutions

    Copper-fill void comparisons need controlled via geometry, seed and plating conditions.

    Basis: The named FAQ describes bottom-up filling and uniform line profiles, without geometry-specific void acceptance limits.
    Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships
    Sample or process prerequisites
    • A via-fill/RDL process candidate, subject to actual geometry and material compatibility.
    Exclusions
    • Scope and limitations It neither inspects nor repairs existing voids, and does not guarantee void-free filling. Other PLP products’ rates, low-Kirkendall-void or barrier features do not transfer. What to prepare BLNKK suggests documenting geometry/aspect ratio, density, seed continuity, pretreatment, bath and current, with section or 3D-fill comparisons. Confirm with the supplier Confirm usable geometry, seed/dielectric compatibility, operating window and bath control, and agree fill, profile and reliability validation.
    View related Q&A
    07
    Adjacent use; applicability needs confirmationPublicly offered; confirm project configuration and availabilityBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

    NEXAR LIDE glass via and microstructure fabrication

    LPKF Laser & Electronics SE

    Compare glass-hole geometry before metallization and fill.

    Basis: Official pages describe the NEXAR LIDE 5000 M/S/P variants and the two-step technology.
    Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships
    Sample or process prerequisites
    • Consider it for glass-core substrates, interposers and glass microstructures, with material and equipment configurations assessed for the project.
    Exclusions
    • Scope and limitations Glass feature formation does not ensure void-free metal filling or establish suitability for silicon TSV processing. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing glass composition and thickness, feature drawings and tolerances, substrate format and the downstream metallization flow. Confirm with the supplier Confirm the current configuration, supported glass and etching integration, and how sample geometry, surface quality and filling compatibility will be evaluated.
    View related Q&A
    08
    Supporting analysis or measurementPublicly offered; confirm project configuration and availabilityBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

    SMV-500F interposer Ti/Cu seed sputtering

    ULVAC, Inc.

    Compare metal-seed coverage before plating.

    Basis: The product page documents seed sputtering and cooling, without project-specific internal coverage evidence.
    Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships
    Relationship to the solution catalogueSupporting inspection method
    ULVAC, Inc.SMV-500F interposer Ti/Cu seed sputteringOpen solution details →
    Sample or process prerequisites
    • ULVAC explicitly names PCB interposers; geometry and material suitability require confirmation.
    Exclusions
    • Scope and limitations PCB-interposer use does not establish continuous coverage in high-aspect-ratio TSVs or compliance with every substrate's thermal limit. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing geometry, target thickness, surface and thermal-budget details, then correlating cross-sections and electrical measurements with fill results. Confirm with the supplier Confirm substrate/chamber configuration, Ti/Cu stack and cooling, plus geometry-specific coverage, continuity and adhesion validation.
    Primary sources behind these assessmentsULVAC, Inc.:SMV-500F interposer Ti/Cu seed sputtering ↗
    View related Q&A
    09
    Part of an evaluation workflowPublicly offered; confirm project configuration and availabilityBLNKK public-source review · Applicability unconfirmed

    MultiPrep targeted cross-section polishing

    Allied High Tech Products, Inc.

    Via-fill void investigation needs a selected via located in an observable section.

    Basis: The official page documents orientation/removal control and separately sold fixtures and platens.
    Check prerequisites, exclusions and catalogue relationships
    Sample or process prerequisites
    • Consider destructive substrate/package preparation with material-specific fixtures and abrasives.
    Exclusions
    • Scope and limitations A section may miss the target void and does not alone establish an original fill defect. BLNKK advises checking smear, pull-out and section-offset artifacts. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing locations/imaging, layer details, section direction and controls, with cutting/mounting/polishing and removal history retained. Confirm with the supplier Confirm fixtures, platens, abrasives, targeting/stopping and microscopy or repeat-section checks for location and preparation quality.
    View related Q&A

    Missing evidence and suitability conditions

    • No transferable void / dimple specification or bath recipe is established for this via geometry. Complete fill also does not establish reliability qualification.
    • Supplier participation, sample validation, and actual professional responses are not yet confirmed; public capabilities do not establish willingness to take on the work.
    • This local method has not yet been published as a canonical solution that demonstrates the same relationship.

    References

    9 manufacturer or institutional sources

    Expand reviewed sources and limitations
    01
    Manufacturer product informationFailure Analysis LabASE · Reviewed 2026-10-04

    Lists capabilities for electrical failure localization, nondestructive X-ray inspection, and targeted cross-section / FIB analysis.

    Limit: The service list does not guarantee detection rates at every RDL or microvia scale; sampling, structures, and destructive risks require confirmation.
    02
    Manufacturer product informationInPro SAP3MKS / Atotech · Reviewed 2026-10-04

    The IC-substrate blind-microvia copper-fill electrolyte is used in VCP. Additives can be controlled using CVS, with claimed via-fill and thickness uniformity.

    Limit: Product capabilities apply to the specified system. They do not establish the cause of this batch's voids; do not directly adopt current density, via dimensions, or dimple values.
    03
    Manufacturer product informationOptimize the interconnectMKS / Atotech · Reviewed 2026-10-04

    The source connects laser drilling, surface treatment, desmear, electroless copper, and electroplating into a microvia-interconnect process.

    Limit: An integrated-capability description; it supplies no causal evidence for these intravia voids or pretreatment recipe ready for direct use.
    04
    Manufacturer product informationInPro MVF blind-microvia copper fillingMKS’ Atotech · Reviewed 2026-10-05

    The MVF/MVF2 page describes process configuration and filling examples; a separate portfolio explains the broader InPro family.

    Limit: Scope and limitations Family-level pulse plating and IC-substrate applications do not establish MVF suitability. Examples and reliability statements do not guarantee void-free filling or qualification for every geometry. What to prepare BLNKK suggests via dimensions, materials/seed layers, existing plating conditions, cross-section defects and surface-copper targets. Confirm with the supplier Confirm MVF/MVF2 selection, geometry-specific process windows, agitation/replenishment, acceptance criteria and reliability-test conditions.
    05
    Manufacturer product informationnano3DX 3D X-ray sampling of substrate copper-fill voidsRigaku · Reviewed 2026-10-06

    Rigaku describes the imaging method; its 2019 journal article demonstrates internal electronic-component and PCB imaging.

    Limit: Scope and limitations Metal thickness and settings affect penetration/contrast. Voxel size is not defect-detection size; images do not establish electrical continuity or chemical identity. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing stack-up, copper thickness, specimen dimensions, suspected void locations/sizes and representative samples for section correlation. Confirm with the supplier Confirm targets, field of view, acquisition/reconstruction, defect recognition and repeatability; discuss correlation with cross-sections.
    06
    Manufacturer product informationMacDermid Alpha Systek VTP 100 via-fill/RDL platingMacDermid Alpha Electronics Solutions · Reviewed 2026-10-06

    The named FAQ describes bottom-up filling and uniform line profiles, without geometry-specific void acceptance limits.

    Limit: Scope and limitations It neither inspects nor repairs existing voids, and does not guarantee void-free filling. Other PLP products’ rates, low-Kirkendall-void or barrier features do not transfer. What to prepare BLNKK suggests documenting geometry/aspect ratio, density, seed continuity, pretreatment, bath and current, with section or 3D-fill comparisons. Confirm with the supplier Confirm usable geometry, seed/dielectric compatibility, operating window and bath control, and agree fill, profile and reliability validation.
    07
    Manufacturer product informationNEXAR LIDE glass via and microstructure fabricationLPKF Laser & Electronics SE · Reviewed 2026-10-06

    Official pages describe the NEXAR LIDE 5000 M/S/P variants and the two-step technology.

    Limit: Scope and limitations Glass feature formation does not ensure void-free metal filling or establish suitability for silicon TSV processing. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing glass composition and thickness, feature drawings and tolerances, substrate format and the downstream metallization flow. Confirm with the supplier Confirm the current configuration, supported glass and etching integration, and how sample geometry, surface quality and filling compatibility will be evaluated.
    08
    Manufacturer product informationSMV-500F interposer Ti/Cu seed sputteringULVAC, Inc. · Reviewed 2026-10-06

    The product page documents seed sputtering and cooling, without project-specific internal coverage evidence.

    Limit: Scope and limitations PCB-interposer use does not establish continuous coverage in high-aspect-ratio TSVs or compliance with every substrate's thermal limit. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing geometry, target thickness, surface and thermal-budget details, then correlating cross-sections and electrical measurements with fill results. Confirm with the supplier Confirm substrate/chamber configuration, Ti/Cu stack and cooling, plus geometry-specific coverage, continuity and adhesion validation.
    09
    Manufacturer product informationMultiPrep targeted cross-section polishingAllied High Tech Products, Inc. · Reviewed 2026-10-06

    The official page documents orientation/removal control and separately sold fixtures and platens.

    Limit: Scope and limitations A section may miss the target void and does not alone establish an original fill defect. BLNKK advises checking smear, pull-out and section-offset artifacts. What to prepare BLNKK suggests preparing locations/imaging, layer details, section direction and controls, with cutting/mounting/polishing and removal history retained. Confirm with the supplier Confirm fixtures, platens, abrasives, targeting/stopping and microscopy or repeat-section checks for location and preparation quality.

    Before assessment

    Questions to ask before assessment

    Expand assessment checklist
    1. Is the void in the copper-fill body or at a Cu / Cu interface after thermal loading?
    2. Are via geometry, panel locations, and normal / abnormal sampling representative?
    3. How can comparable histories of pretreatment, waiting, CVS, current, and solution flow be preserved?
    View related technical Q&A →
    BLNKK editorial notes

    Related technical Q&A

    • Is the void in the copper-fill body or at a Cu / Cu interface after thermal loading?
    • Are via geometry, panel locations, and normal / abnormal sampling representative?
    View related technical Q&A →